Word After Word

Craft

I was taught creative writing two ways. In one sequence of classes, I learned about character, plot, point of view, theme, and irony.  In these kind of creative writing classes I learned to read and my writing absolutely improved. I could not figure out how to do the character concepts, the plot planning, etc. And point of view—it seemed like a mind-bending made-up muddler. I never believed you really needed point of view. Couldn’t I just write? Wouldn’t POV happen, anyway, and then other people could figure out what I had done? Couldn’t my teacher, who kept writing POV! in my margins simply shift her own POV and quit hacking away at mine? Craft worried me. And my writing got better. But I didn’t see a correlation. I never knew what I was doing differently. I never knew what I was doing at all. I was scared to investigate the process. I was scared to do exercises for plot, point of view, character, and theme; couldn’t exercises ruin my sparky natural genius? Waste my time? I wanted to stay pure. Or, be an outsider artist.  I was always afraid writing exercises would teach me to be really good at doing writing exercises.

 

In another sequence of classes we were asked puzzling Zen-like questions and the teacher drew inscrutable, hilarious diagrams on the board and pointed out what was interesting (art) and what was instructive (bad art). There wasn’t a textbook. The indication was life was the textbook, or the class, or our own depressing stories, or our responses to them or maybe the teacher conferences. The word “craft” was replaced with the word “shape.” Again, I didn’t really know how to apply what was discussed in class, but I wrote and wrote and I accepted that the point of view rules mattered a lot to some (much older) people. I decided to conform to the rules, as one conforms to the conventions of capital letters and lower case.

 

 About how to learn creative writing. What was it we were actually trying to sit down and do? 

When I was in junior high and failing math (for reasons that had more to do with missing a lot of school because my mother was very, very ill—I liked math and the idea of math, making stuff out of math) I remember telling my mom one night that I was going to write a textbook. I would have all the classes in one book. “If they’d just explain the whole system, and how it all relates and builds on concepts from other classes. If they’d tell you up front where it’s all headed, what the big picture is, then I think I’d get it.” My mom thought this was a great idea for a textbook. 

I wrote The Practice of Creative Writing.  In my textbook, I want the student to learn character, plot, theme, and point of view, but from the inside out, not top down. I wanted to marry the two ways of teaching creative writing into one helpful, practical course. Students have better luck when they write, and then read. They write a story, leaning into layers, working on tension, and then in class the teacher says “This is a great example of point of view. See what happened here?” Aha!

But what might have helped me become a writer, as much as anything else, I could not put into my textbook for new writers. The secret classroom was parties. The craft teachers and the funny diagram teachers all had us over to their generous beautiful professor-y homes for wonderful parties (the craft teacher liked a theme, such as Red; her parties had a terrific point of view). Newspaper writers, sexy history professors, graduate students, editors, random neighbors, speech writers, ex-spouses and pets and long sofas: in the living rooms of our teachers, we tried to converse. They pretended we would be writers and we pretended to be grown ups. That’s craft.

 

 

1 Comment so far

  1. Nathan Klay October 24th, 2007 12:19 am

    Dear Heather,

    Although I no longer write creatively… (I do write in essay form, lately on matters of theology)…

    I notice this tension, which exists constantly in the visual arts, between two approaches that artists inevitably take. One: Emphasis on Craftsmanship… a kind of manual dexterity-based value and Two: Conceptual… an expansive no-barriers grab-bag where the artist can almost remove him/herself from the “art”, sometimes the “audience” is the art.

    In writing, I think that (primarily) it is the poets who are most able to sway from one approach or another. Do prose-writers feel as much freedom? There is the inescapable grammar, sentence, paragraph, chapter, book, etc.

    I imagine that once a creative prose-writer has found him/herself to be a creative prose-writer… what novices might initially feel confined by (aspects of craft) are less felt by the non-novices??

    Do you ever feel like you want to get your creative labor/energy off of the page you so constantly confront… to grab hold of the monitor and glue it to the wall for a nice wall-sculpture? Is there a point when nothing’s left? But that’s a different questing from this one. What about those writers that seem to live long periods of time, soaking up life as they live it… but wait, and wait… as if a diamond is being formed in the pressure of their soul and prematurely relieving the pressure would ruin the diamond… Exaples: Norman Maclean published A River Runs Through It and Other Stories when he was 72. William Kittredge just now published his wonderful, first novel The Willow Field. He’s 74. But these two guys are best known for being great “memoirists.” I wonder if that makes a difference.

    I mention the above because I’ve had the experience of having the creative faucet turned right off, both in writing and visual art. I don’t see anything on the canvas anymore. I don’t hear any poetic lines. But I still adore both painting and poetry, so I pour over others’ painting and poetry.

    I apologize for the length of my scattered comments. It was extremely refreshing and exciting to look at your new website and read about all the cool stuff you’re doing!

    Sincerely,

    Nathan

Leave a reply